Preliminary analysis - INGOC
2006
Based on data entered in the INGOC database, following
conclusions could be drawn:
Comparative
values of INGOC results |
INGOC
Index Cycle One |
INGOC
Index Cycle Two |
Change
after 1 year |
Total |
Top
10 |
Total |
Top
10 |
%
of change |
Top
10 |
| strategic
management |
basic |
0,61 |
0,90 |
0,56 |
0,98 |
-0,05 |
0,08 |
| advanced |
0,21 |
0,48 |
0,28 |
0,68 |
0,07 |
0,20 |
| combined |
0,41 |
0,69 |
0,42 |
0,83 |
0,01 |
0,14 |
| human
resource management |
basic |
0,60 |
0,70 |
0,57 |
0,88 |
-0,03 |
0,18 |
| advanced |
0,40 |
0,62 |
0,41 |
0,75 |
0,01 |
0,13 |
| combined |
0,50 |
0,69 |
0,49 |
0,82 |
-0,01 |
0,13 |
| finance
management |
basic |
0,80 |
0,97 |
0,77 |
0,98 |
-0,03 |
0,01 |
| advanced |
0,59 |
0,85 |
0,55 |
0,86 |
-0,04 |
0,01 |
| combined |
0,70 |
0,91 |
0,66 |
0,92 |
-0,04 |
0,01 |
| program
quality |
basic |
0,65 |
0,71 |
0,66 |
0,99 |
0,01 |
0,28 |
| advanced |
0,47 |
0,72 |
0,43 |
0,95 |
-0,04 |
0,23 |
| combined |
0,56 |
0,71 |
0,55 |
0,97 |
-0,01 |
0,26 |
| communication
and collaboration |
basic |
0,69 |
0,79 |
0,44 |
0,82 |
-0,25 |
0,03 |
| advanced |
0,81 |
0,92 |
0,55 |
0,88 |
-0,26 |
-0,04 |
| combined |
0,75 |
0,86 |
0,49 |
0,85 |
-0,26 |
-0,01 |
| total
- basic |
0,67 |
0,82 |
0,60 |
0,93 |
-0,07 |
0,11 |
| total
– advanced |
0,50 |
0,72 |
0,44 |
0,83 |
-0,06 |
0,11 |
| TOTAL |
0,58 |
0,77 |
0,52 |
0,88 |
-0,06 |
0,11 |
Due to the expansion of INGOC tool in Serbian NGO
sector, index value in total went down. In aspect
of top ten NGOs, index value went up.
Top five NGOs which showed the biggest improvement
between two cycles:
Aspect |
Centar
za razvoj Srbije |
Centar
za razvoj civilnog društva Zrenjanin |
Omladina
Jazasa |
Entuzijasti
Kučeva |
Istraživačka
stanica Petnica |
| strategic
management |
cycle
1 |
0,25 |
0,00 |
0,75 |
0,20 |
0,70 |
| cycle 2 |
0,85 |
0,40 |
1,00 |
0,35 |
|
| cycle 3 |
0,60 |
0,40 |
0,25 |
0,15 |
0,20 |
| human
resource management |
cycle
1 |
0,25 |
0,25 |
0,61 |
0,24 |
0,76 |
| cycle 2 |
0,57 |
0,36 |
0,84 |
0,46 |
0,82 |
| cycle 3 |
0,32 |
0,11 |
0,23 |
0,22 |
0,06 |
| finance
management |
cycle
1 |
0,63 |
0,53 |
0,85 |
0,38 |
0,83 |
| cycle 2 |
0,80 |
0,55 |
0,95 |
0,65 |
0,93 |
| cycle 3 |
0,17 |
0,02 |
0,10 |
0,27 |
0,10 |
| program
quality |
cycle
1 |
0,60 |
0,30 |
0,50 |
0,10 |
0,65 |
| cycle 2 |
0,85 |
0,70 |
1,00 |
0,45 |
1,00 |
| cycle 3 |
0,25 |
0,40 |
0,50 |
0,35 |
0,35 |
| communication
and collaboration |
cycle
1 |
0,75 |
0,39 |
0,99 |
0,37 |
0,70 |
| cycle 2 |
0,64 |
0,59 |
0,95 |
0,38 |
0,71 |
| cycle 3 |
-0,11 |
0,20 |
-0,04 |
0,01 |
0,01 |
| Total |
cycle
1 |
0,50 |
0,29 |
0,74 |
0,26 |
0,73 |
| cycle 2 |
0,74 |
0,52 |
0,95 |
0,46 |
0,87 |
| cycle 3 |
0,25 |
0,23 |
0,21 |
0,20 |
0,14 |
Comparative values of INGOC results
Comparative
values of INGOC results for the NGOs which were
included in both cycles |
INGOC
Index |
Change
after 1 year
|
| Cycle
1 |
Cycle
2 |
| strategic
management |
basic |
0,59 |
0,67 |
0,08 
|
| advanced |
0,25 |
0,37 |
0,12 |
| combined |
0,42 |
0,52 |
0,10 |
| human
resource management |
basic |
0,60 |
0,69 |
0,09 |
| advanced |
0,42 |
0,51 |
0,09 |
| combined |
0,51 |
0,60 |
0,09 |
| finance
management |
basic |
0,81 |
0,88 |
0,07 |
| advanced |
0,59 |
0,65 |
0,06 |
| combined |
0,70 |
0,76 |
0,06 |
| program
quality |
basic |
0,61 |
0,79 |
0,18 |
| advanced |
0,48 |
0,54 |
0,06 |
| combined |
0,55 |
0,66 |
0,11 |
| communication
and collaboration |
basic |
0,68 |
0,56 |
-0,12
|
| advanced |
0,79 |
0,72 |
-0,07
|
| combined |
0,73 |
0,64 |
-0,09
|
| total
- basic |
0,66 |
0,72 |
0,06 |
| total
– advanced |
0,50 |
0,56 |
0,06 |
| TOTAL |
0,58 |
0,64 |
0,06 |
From these results we can draw conclusion that NGOs
which participated in both cycles made improvement
in all aspects except in aspect of communication and
collaboration. In this aspect the Index is decreasing
which can be result of reformulating of indicators.
|
